NINJA lending and the Pointless Freedom of Youth

by George on 14 September 2007

The crisis in the US sub-prime mortgage market has been a topic in broadsheet City and Business Diaries for over a year now with the question being asked “Will there be a property market correction or crash here?” The concensus seems to be No (probably) although some sort of correction is expected as the combination of higher interest rates on the one hand and Gordon Brown’s stealth taxes on the other hand squeeze living standards and real income. Other indications that a house price boom is over, is when prices in the provinces start to catch up London and the South East and demand for rental properties increases as buying becomes increasingly unaffordable, both of which are happening now.

In property, bond and stock markets markets, whenever there is a shake-out, correction or whatever some pundit calls it, there is usually a “flight to quality” meaning that good stuff will sell easily and generally hold or even increase its value whereas more marginal properties will take ages to sell and probably only at a reduced price. If this means “negative equity” again, then people tend to stay put themselves and put off having children.

Against this, interest rates would have to rise by about two per cent before mortgage costs equal the same proportion of earnings as in the late 1980s and there is a shortage of properties in some areas, hence the (probably). I hope that this Government’s lunatic obsession with Home Information Packs or HIPs is not the last straw that breaks the camel’s back here. Their £600 + cost is the last thing a couple needs saving up to get on the housing ladder or move home with a growing family http://www.georgeemsden.co.uk/?p=42

In all this cheerful speculation, I find a new word or acronym – NINJA lending in The Daily Telegraph City Diary. Everyone knows YUPPIES (Young Upwardly-mobile Professionals) and there are also DINKYs (Double Income No Kids Yet) but lending to NINJAs (No Income, No Job or Assets) seems positively bizarre to an old banker turned IFA like yours truly. Researching this acronym on Google, I discover a most amusing blog by Barbara Ehrenreich http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barbara-ehrenreich/smashing-capitalismb61144.html With its eye-catching title of Smashing Capitalism, it is almost like being a student again. Her latest blog is similarly amusing http://www.huffingtonpost.com/_63455.html Freshpersons, Welcome to Debt. And if you want to know what on earth an Upanishad is, well you will have to Google that for yourself.

Staying with the theme of sub-prime lending, Lehman Brothers, the American investment bank anounced that they were shutting down South Pacific Mortgage Lending (SPML) a leading UK sub-prime mortgage lender only weeks after having had motivational meetings with staff. These acquired the soubriquet “town hall” meetings for senior staff and “brown paper bag” meetings for junior staff. Staff departures probably accounted for part of the reason to shut SPML down but whether they just panicked, we will not know – at least for while – as the staff haven’t got their “severence bonuses”(?) yet. Eighteen months ago they were doing £100 million business a month but this had fallen off drastically recently.

The net margins on prime lending are not huge, being about 0.2 per cent p.a. on average while the same figure for sub-prime lending is over 1 per cent. Whereas prime variable rates have increased by about one per cent recently, some sub-prime lenders have increased their margins by over 2 per cent. In theory, the interest rate or rather the margin over the cost of funds is meant to reflect the lending risk. But when prime borrowers with good jobs and clean credit records are struggling with a one per cent increase, how on earth are people who are not such a good risk going to manage with more than double the increase? The huge increase in sub-prime rates will only create the problem it was supposed to cover and seems a case of lenders running for cover. It is a classic example of the cure being worse than the disease but according to Barbara above, this type of lending was meant to end in tears anyway.

Within a few days, a stampede seems to develop with Rooftop, Advantage, Future Mortgages and The Mortgage Works anouncing that the higher LTV products are being withdrawn all within in a couple of days. Sometimes this is with immediate effect and sometimes with two weeks left to get “fully packaged” application in. Fully packaged here means the properly completed and signed application, every single bit of information that the lender might require e.g. bank statement, Money Laundering information. In response to complaints about service standards sometime ago when the market was booming, the Woolwich pointed out that 10 per cent of their applications needed to be returned because a signature was missing. A mistake here by the borrowers could mean that their application will be done under new stricter and more expensive criteria – if at all.

Victoria Mortgages a leading sub-prime packager puts itself into Adminstration but to cheer me up, I get an e-mail telling me that “prices in Bucharest are rising by the day”. The only sensible news seems to be from TMB owned by HBOS (Bank of Scotland Group) who announce that they will step in to help Victoria with their application packaging. TMB are a leading lender in the self-certification market and shows that the Scots don’t carry the epiphet “canny” without reason.

If you have any concerns here, please click on Contact at the top right of this page.

By way of a change, let me say a little about investments. It is easy to overlook some rather basic lessons when thinking about putting your money into the Stock Market which is where the best returns usually are:

  • the safest way to invest in equity funds or stock markets is to invest regularly say, every month. This means you can forget about choosing a good time to invest. The ups and downs in the market (what pundits call the volatility) actually work in your favour through something called pound cost averaging.

  • if you are going to invest a lump-sum in something like an ISA, do it at the start of the tax year rather than at the end as the longer you are invested, the more likely you are to beat investing in cash or fixed interest securities. The Barclays Capital Gilt Equity study reinforces this every year.

  • Couples that do not use their income and capital allowances, are basically throwing money away. My heart sinks when I come across couples where the income, dividends and interest is in all the earner’s name and the partner’s allowances are not being used. This is especially silly when the earner is a Higher Rate Income Tax payer and the other partner has no income because they are bringing up their children.

  • the easiest way to spread investment risk is to have your portfolio in different asset classes and geographical areas. Starting with a decent managed fund is the simplest way here, diversfying into different areas over time. Quite a lot of people seem to make a step in this direction by picking up a leaflet from their bank or building society (the so-called bancassurers) while standing in a queue at their branch. On average though, bancassurers’ funds and products tend to have above-average charges and below-average performance.

  • if you thinking of investing for income now, it might be a good idea to choose a fixed-interest or fixed return investment as inflation looks set to fall as the steep energy price inceases work their way out of the annual inflation figures. If you invest in a fixed return investment now, you are basically locking in when inflation and the returns offered are high. The Governor of the Bank of England MPC has also said this week that interest rates may be at their peak. If you choose an index-liked investment, the return will fall as inflation falls. Check the exit terms though as getting out of fixed investments early, can be very costly.

To finish on a youthful, light and musical note, Joe Boyd the author of one of my holiday reads White Bicycles will be on a BBC Radio 3 programme 40 years on 1st and 8th October at 10:15pm. If your memories of the pop music in the 1960s are a bit hazy, this should bring some of them back, especially if you went to The Roundhouse in Chalk Farm in North London. Names he was involved with include: Pink Floyd, Bob Dylan, The Move, Fairport Convention and Incredible String Band. The broadcast will also be available via the internet and the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/ has a very useful facility of letting you listen on-line to radio programmes you may have missed, up to one month later.

  • Roger M Taylor FCIB

    Dear George

    Good to see an upbeat message from you.

    Talking of old bankers, I thought when Lloyds TSB shares reached £6.10 they were on their way up to the £7.30 mark.

    This would still be a fairway short of a large tranche I bought at £10.30 but I had every confidence in an employer who still pays me a salary after all these years.

    I am now prompted to recite that quote from old Thailand, “Owar Tanar Siam”.

    It looks as though I will have to continue to work a while longer, I fear. Either that or do a “bit of window cleaning on the side” as one Ronnie said to the other in one of their famous tramp sketches.

    S & F as always

    Roger

  • http://www.in2consulting.co.uk George

    Roger The “Owar Tanar Siam” quote nearly got me! I was just on the point of e-mailing my chums in Thailand when I googled it and of course, if you say “Owar Tanar Siam” to yourself several times, its meaning will be revealed. Thanks again George

  • Chrsystine Payjack

    Marrying Roger’s and my blog relpy, maybe I could have kept things shorter and more simple, by just stating:

    I want to thank you bankers and financial advisors for making High Finance sound so simple, when to us amatures it’s Sofa King Snot.

    Chrsytine

  • http://www.in2consulting.co.uk George

    Chrystine, I have put my answer to your comment in BLOCK CAPITALS and hope you find them useful.

    +++++++++++

    Hi George, if I understood half of this I would say, ‘thank you.’ But it is the sort of read, getting up early (7:14) on a Saturday morning, keeping up the adage that the ‘early bird catches the worm’(more truthfully I am currently so stressed I can’t sleep) makes me want to go back to bed with my head under the pillow, run for cover, or cry.

    I do have a prime rental property in Central London that estate agencies are begging me to sell and my two tenants, a high flying solicitor and a cricket betting analyst whose sole ‘work’ is watching cricket matches around the world and informing betting offices of the likelihood of wins do not want me to because they love it so much.(or if I sold at the right price would think of buying)

    This year I am not making any money on the high rental because it matches exactly what I lose this year in capital gains tax (?) . I think that is the evil word – I understand these things so badly. (YOU WILL ONLY HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT CAPITAL GAINS TAX IF YOU SELL THE RENTAL PROPERTY)

    My patient tax advisor Keith Pike explains these things to me every year, but it still confuses me. (ASK HIM AGAIN IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND) Until this tax year I cleared approx 10K rental profit annually with a lot of agro. This year the Capital Gains (INCOME TAX I THINK) watershed really catches up to me and I earn nothing from the rental due to capital gains losses on it. I maintain status quo – rent = (INCOME) tax loss. He thinks if I sold now I could do as little as stick the profits into a high interest savings account and would earn 15K on interest alone. As I have virtually no pension that would be a good idea. However, he tells me if I do this I loose the opportunity of any future rises in the property market.

    I bought it for £34K in 1992, Lovely flat in a prime location. I have to say it is the only smart move I have ever made financially in my life time. (IF YOU SELL THIS, THERE WILL BE CAPITAL GAINS TAX TO PAY. ASK KEITH TO DO A CALCULATION SO YOU CAN KEEP THE MONEY ASIDE FOR WHEN IT NEEDS TO BE PAID) I have never sold it because it is seeped in all our family memories – the kids were born there, the cats are buried in the garden. (You can tell I am a romantic not a cold hard financer. Now that my youngest is off to University I face the ominous question, where do I want to live for the ‘rest’ (joke, re the homonym – I am a social worker by trade) of my life. (DO YOU WANT TO SELL IT?)

    For the above reasons, the kids are sad about selling it – not only for nostalgia reasons but because once gone, due to the property market it is clear none of us will ever be able to buy into London again. Born and raised in London with all their friends there, they are Londoners at heart. (IN YEARS APPROACHING RETIREMENT THERE ARE OFTEN CONFLICTS BETWEEN PARENTS’ NEEDS AND THE CHILDREN’S NEEDS. MY PHILOSOPHY HERE IS THAT THE CHILDREN ARE YOUNG AND WILL HAVE TO LOOK AFTER THEMSELVES but IT IS YOUR FAMILY HERE, NOT MINE)

    However, the interest only mortgage I have on it is really love. I took out a £190K transportable mortgage over five years. It has to be paid off in three years.

    MY kids are also between the DINKY’s and NINJAs status. I am a SOAP WNP (almost a single old age pensioner with no pension)

    One daughter is a DINKY on a low teaching salary but married to a professional classical musician. They can’t get a mortgage because his earnings are not recognised. (THEY CAN GET A SELF-CERTIFIED MORTGAGE – FOR EXAMPLE – I ARRANGE THESE. NOTHING WRONG WITH BEING A MUSICIAN WHERE GETTING A MORTGAGE IS CONCERNED. ALL THEY REALLY NEED TO WORRY ABOUT IS HOW MUCH THEY CAN AFFORD) They put off having a family as long as they could and at 27 she is pregnant with her first. They are currently moving out of London to rent as her salary is gone in two weeks on basic outlay (rent and utility bills). Her father has offered her the flat above his dental surgery rental free so that they can catch up to themselves and the baby does not starve. My NINJA has just started university.

    I am advised that my flat is worth 500 to 515K and I worry I have missed the boom with head in the sand procrastination ‘to sell or not to sell?’. (I DOUBT IF YOU HAVE MISSED THE BOOM – NO NEED TO BE TOO CLEVER HERE

    IF YOU WANT TO KEEP IT THEN KEEP IT AND YOU WOULD EARN THE RENT AS INCOME.

    IF YOU PREFER TO SELL THEN SELL IT. THE NET AMOUNT YOU WOULD HAVE TO INVEST FOR INCOME WOULD BE ABOUT £310,000 LESS ANY CAPITAL GAINS TAX DUE. YOU COULD EARN ABOUT 7 PER CENT A YEAR IN A LOW-RISK PORTFOLIO AND YOU WOULD NOT HAVE THE HASSLE OF TENANTS. WE DO A LOT OF LOW-RISK INVESTMENT BUSINESS FOR OUR CLIENTS)

    It was virtually paid off with only £20K mortgage on it when I took a £190K interest only mortgage out on it to buy the house I live in currently at the end of my last separation. The one I live in now is a house with no mortgage and would give me the same profit on it if I sold it – only larger properties are not selling here at the moment – they are sitting dead – probably due to this HIP nightmare. (MAYBE)

    So the question of which to sell, on the face of it, looks ready made for me. SELL THE BLOODY FLAT QUICK SEEMS TO SCREAM OUT AT ME (your block capitals here)

    Only I like choice. I hate being boxed into corners by circumstance.

    However, since I am a ‘SOAP WNP ‘what I get out of it has to be managed pretty cannily.

    I am sure your blog is informative, but for those of us who are not canny with money your blog is like reading Greek with no glasses in the dark instilling more fear than answers. (YOU NEED MORE ADVICE HERE. THE WHOLE IDEA OF MY WRITING THE BLOG IS TO RELIEVE ANXIETY RATHER THAN CREATE IT. WE REALLY OUGHT TO MEET I THINK)

    HTH

    George

  • Pingback: UK Debt Blog » NINJA lending and the Pointless Freedom of Youth

Previous post:

Next post: